"Beauty is an important ingredient of our daily lives. We admire and praise the beauty of nature, architecture, music, other people... Given its pervasiveness, the lack of research addressing aesthetics in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) is striking." One can despise beauty because of its notorious elusiveness or fight about whether beauty can be reduced to some numbers on scalesas David Frohlich put it: "It didn't seem to me to be the kind of thing that could be measured so easily with a seven-point bipolar scale and a pencil" [2], Not to mention the succession of philosophers who already devoted entire lives to understanding the transcendental nature of beauty. Given the myriad views on beauty, it may be more a matter of position than of truth. Nevertheless, Noam Tractinsky recently summarized what we know research-wise about beauty applied to HCI, which seems to be substantial enough [3]. We know, for example, a fair bit about the processes underlying judgments of beauty. When we look at an object, the percept is emotionally processed. This leads to a positive or negative responsean involuntary, fast, and effortless process. Attributed to the visual gestalt of an object, this response becomes its beauty. We know that the object was capable of creating this response for us and that it might continue to do so in the future.
"Beauty is an important ingredient of our daily lives. We admire and praise the beauty of nature, architecture, music, other people... Given its pervasiveness, the lack of research addressing aesthetics in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) is striking." One can despise beauty because of its notorious elusiveness or fight about whether beauty can be reduced to some numbers on scalesas David Frohlich put it: "It didn't seem to me to be the kind of thing that could be measured so easily with a seven-point bipolar scale and a pencil" [2], Not to mention the succession of philosophers who already devoted entire lives to understanding the transcendental nature of beauty. Given the myriad views on beauty, it may be more a matter of position than of truth. Nevertheless, Noam Tractinsky recently summarized what we know research-wise about beauty applied to HCI, which seems to be substantial enough [3]. We know, for example, a fair bit about the processes underlying judgments of beauty. When we look at an object, the percept is emotionally processed. This leads to a positive or negative responsean involuntary, fast, and effortless process. Attributed to the visual gestalt of an object, this response becomes its beauty. We know that the object was capable of creating this response for us and that it might continue to do so in the future.
"Beauty is an important ingredient of our daily lives. We admire and praise the beauty of nature, architecture, music, other people... Given its pervasiveness, the lack of research addressing aesthetics in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) is striking." One can despise beauty because of its notorious elusiveness or fight about whether beauty can be reduced to some numbers on scalesas David Frohlich put it: "It didn't seem to me to be the kind of thing that could be measured so easily with a seven-point bipolar scale and a pencil" [2], Not to mention the succession of philosophers who already devoted entire lives to understanding the transcendental nature of beauty. Given the myriad views on beauty, it may be more a matter of position than of truth. Nevertheless, Noam Tractinsky recently summarized what we know research-wise about beauty applied to HCI, which seems to be substantial enough [3]. We know, for example, a fair bit about the processes underlying judgments of beauty. When we look at an object, the percept is emotionally processed. This leads to a positive or negative responsean involuntary, fast, and effortless process. Attributed to the visual gestalt of an object, this response becomes its beauty. We know that the object was capable of creating this response for us and that it might continue to do so in the future.
"Beauty is an important ingredient of our daily lives. We admire and praise the beauty of nature, architecture, music, other people... Given its pervasiveness, the lack of research addressing aesthetics in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) is striking." One can despise beauty because of its notorious elusiveness or fight about whether beauty can be reduced to some numbers on scalesas David Frohlich put it: "It didn't seem to me to be the kind of thing that could be measured so easily with a seven-point bipolar scale and a pencil" [2], Not to mention the succession of philosophers who already devoted entire lives to understanding the transcendental nature of beauty. Given the myriad views on beauty, it may be more a matter of position than of truth. Nevertheless, Noam Tractinsky recently summarized what we know research-wise about beauty applied to HCI, which seems to be substantial enough [3]. We know, for example, a fair bit about the processes underlying judgments of beauty. When we look at an object, the percept is emotionally processed. This leads to a positive or negative responsean involuntary, fast, and effortless process. Attributed to the visual gestalt of an object, this response becomes its beauty. We know that the object was capable of creating this response for us and that it might continue to do so in the future.
"Beauty is an important ingredient of our daily lives. We admire and praise the beauty of nature, architecture, music, other people... Given its pervasiveness, the lack of research addressing aesthetics in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) is striking." One can despise beauty because of its notorious elusiveness or fight about whether beauty can be reduced to some numbers on scalesas David Frohlich put it: "It didn't seem to me to be the kind of thing that could be measured so easily with a seven-point bipolar scale and a pencil" [2], Not to mention the succession of philosophers who already devoted entire lives to understanding the transcendental nature of beauty. Given the myriad views on beauty, it may be more a matter of position than of truth. Nevertheless, Noam Tractinsky recently summarized what we know research-wise about beauty applied to HCI, which seems to be substantial enough [3]. We know, for example, a fair bit about the processes underlying judgments of beauty. When we look at an object, the percept is emotionally processed. This leads to a positive or negative responsean involuntary, fast, and effortless process. Attributed to the visual gestalt of an object, this response becomes its beauty. We know that the object was capable of creating this response for us and that it might continue to do so in the future.
"Beauty is an important ingredient of our daily lives. We admire and praise the beauty of nature, architecture, music, other people... Given its pervasiveness, the lack of research addressing aesthetics in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) is striking." One can despise beauty because of its notorious elusiveness or fight about whether beauty can be reduced to some numbers on scalesas David Frohlich put it: "It didn't seem to me to be the kind of thing that could be measured so easily with a seven-point bipolar scale and a pencil" [2], Not to mention the succession of philosophers who already devoted entire lives to understanding the transcendental nature of beauty. Given the myriad views on beauty, it may be more a matter of position than of truth. Nevertheless, Noam Tractinsky recently summarized what we know research-wise about beauty applied to HCI, which seems to be substantial enough [3]. We know, for example, a fair bit about the processes underlying judgments of beauty. When we look at an object, the percept is emotionally processed. This leads to a positive or negative responsean involuntary, fast, and effortless process. Attributed to the visual gestalt of an object, this response becomes its beauty. We know that the object was capable of creating this response for us and that it might continue to do so in the future.
"Beauty is an important ingredient of our daily lives. We admire and praise the beauty of nature, architecture, music, other people... Given its pervasiveness, the lack of research addressing aesthetics in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) is striking." One can despise beauty because of its notorious elusiveness or fight about whether beauty can be reduced to some numbers on scalesas David Frohlich put it: "It didn't seem to me to be the kind of thing that could be measured so easily with a seven-point bipolar scale and a pencil" [2], Not to mention the succession of philosophers who already devoted entire lives to understanding the transcendental nature of beauty. Given the myriad views on beauty, it may be more a matter of position than of truth. Nevertheless, Noam Tractinsky recently summarized what we know research-wise about beauty applied to HCI, which seems to be substantial enough [3]. We know, for example, a fair bit about the processes underlying judgments of beauty. When we look at an object, the percept is emotionally processed. This leads to a positive or negative responsean involuntary, fast, and effortless process. Attributed to the visual gestalt of an object, this response becomes its beauty. We know that the object was capable of creating this response for us and that it might continue to do so in the future.
"Beauty is an important ingredient of our daily lives. We admire and praise the beauty of nature, architecture, music, other people... Given its pervasiveness, the lack of research addressing aesthetics in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) is striking." One can despise beauty because of its notorious elusiveness or fight about whether beauty can be reduced to some numbers on scalesas David Frohlich put it: "It didn't seem to me to be the kind of thing that could be measured so easily with a seven-point bipolar scale and a pencil" [2], Not to mention the succession of philosophers who already devoted entire lives to understanding the transcendental nature of beauty. Given the myriad views on beauty, it may be more a matter of position than of truth. Nevertheless, Noam Tractinsky recently summarized what we know research-wise about beauty applied to HCI, which seems to be substantial enough [3]. We know, for example, a fair bit about the processes underlying judgments of beauty. When we look at an object, the percept is emotionally processed. This leads to a positive or negative responsean involuntary, fast, and effortless process. Attributed to the visual gestalt of an object, this response becomes its beauty. We know that the object was capable of creating this response for us and that it might continue to do so in the future.
"Beauty is an important ingredient of our daily lives. We admire and praise the beauty of nature, architecture, music, other people... Given its pervasiveness, the lack of research addressing aesthetics in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) is striking." One can despise beauty because of its notorious elusiveness or fight about whether beauty can be reduced to some numbers on scalesas David Frohlich put it: "It didn't seem to me to be the kind of thing that could be measured so easily with a seven-point bipolar scale and a pencil" [2], Not to mention the succession of philosophers who already devoted entire lives to understanding the transcendental nature of beauty. Given the myriad views on beauty, it may be more a matter of position than of truth. Nevertheless, Noam Tractinsky recently summarized what we know research-wise about beauty applied to HCI, which seems to be substantial enough [3]. We know, for example, a fair bit about the processes underlying judgments of beauty. When we look at an object, the percept is emotionally processed. This leads to a positive or negative responsean involuntary, fast, and effortless process. Attributed to the visual gestalt of an object, this response becomes its beauty. We know that the object was capable of creating this response for us and that it might continue to do so in the future.
"Beauty is an important ingredient of our daily lives. We admire and praise the beauty of nature, architecture, music, other people... Given its pervasiveness, the lack of research addressing aesthetics in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) is striking." One can despise beauty because of its notorious elusiveness or fight about whether beauty can be reduced to some numbers on scalesas David Frohlich put it: "It didn't seem to me to be the kind of thing that could be measured so easily with a seven-point bipolar scale and a pencil" [2], Not to mention the succession of philosophers who already devoted entire lives to understanding the transcendental nature of beauty. Given the myriad views on beauty, it may be more a matter of position than of truth. Nevertheless, Noam Tractinsky recently summarized what we know research-wise about beauty applied to HCI, which seems to be substantial enough [3]. We know, for example, a fair bit about the processes underlying judgments of beauty. When we look at an object, the percept is emotionally processed. This leads to a positive or negative responsean involuntary, fast, and effortless process. Attributed to the visual gestalt of an object, this response becomes its beauty. We know that the object was capable of creating this response for us and that it might continue to do so in the future.
"Beauty is an important ingredient of our daily lives. We admire and praise the beauty of nature, architecture, music, other people... Given its pervasiveness, the lack of research addressing aesthetics in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) is striking." One can despise beauty because of its notorious elusiveness or fight about whether beauty can be reduced to some numbers on scalesas David Frohlich put it: "It didn't seem to me to be the kind of thing that could be measured so easily with a seven-point bipolar scale and a pencil" [2], Not to mention the succession of philosophers who already devoted entire lives to understanding the transcendental nature of beauty. Given the myriad views on beauty, it may be more a matter of position than of truth. Nevertheless, Noam Tractinsky recently summarized what we know research-wise about beauty applied to HCI, which seems to be substantial enough [3]. We know, for example, a fair bit about the processes underlying judgments of beauty. When we look at an object, the percept is emotionally processed. This leads to a positive or negative responsean involuntary, fast, and effortless process. Attributed to the visual gestalt of an object, this response becomes its beauty. We know that the object was capable of creating this response for us and that it might continue to do so in the future.
"Beauty is an important ingredient of our daily lives. We admire and praise the beauty of nature, architecture, music, other people... Given its pervasiveness, the lack of research addressing aesthetics in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) is striking." One can despise beauty because of its notorious elusiveness or fight about whether beauty can be reduced to some numbers on scalesas David Frohlich put it: "It didn't seem to me to be the kind of thing that could be measured so easily with a seven-point bipolar scale and a pencil" [2], Not to mention the succession of philosophers who already devoted entire lives to understanding the transcendental nature of beauty. Given the myriad views on beauty, it may be more a matter of position than of truth. Nevertheless, Noam Tractinsky recently summarized what we know research-wise about beauty applied to HCI, which seems to be substantial enough [3]. We know, for example, a fair bit about the processes underlying judgments of beauty. When we look at an object, the percept is emotionally processed. This leads to a positive or negative responsean involuntary, fast, and effortless process. Attributed to the visual gestalt of an object, this response becomes its beauty. We know that the object was capable of creating this response for us and that it might continue to do so in the future.
"Beauty is an important ingredient of our daily lives. We admire and praise the beauty of nature, architecture, music, other people... Given its pervasiveness, the lack of research addressing aesthetics in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) is striking." One can despise beauty because of its notorious elusiveness or fight about whether beauty can be reduced to some numbers on scalesas David Frohlich put it: "It didn't seem to me to be the kind of thing that could be measured so easily with a seven-point bipolar scale and a pencil" [2], Not to mention the succession of philosophers who already devoted entire lives to understanding the transcendental nature of beauty. Given the myriad views on beauty, it may be more a matter of position than of truth. Nevertheless, Noam Tractinsky recently summarized what we know research-wise about beauty applied to HCI, which seems to be substantial enough [3]. We know, for example, a fair bit about the processes underlying judgments of beauty. When we look at an object, the percept is emotionally processed. This leads to a positive or negative responsean involuntary, fast, and effortless process. Attributed to the visual gestalt of an object, this response becomes its beauty. We know that the object was capable of creating this response for us and that it might continue to do so in the future.